snapdragon 835 vs exynos 9810

compare prices and read user reviews for Mobile Phones Mobile Phones w/o Contract with Screen features: without aussparung (notch)/kameraloch (punch hole), SoC: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 Avec ses A11 et A10, Apple a toujours 2 années d'avance sur la concurrence Android, représentées par les Snapdragon 845 et Exynos 9810. A l'occasion de l'arrivée du Cortex-A76, le site de The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points. Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an The Samsung Exynos 9810 has the highest max frequency, but Snapdragon 845 has a max frequency of 2.8 GHz for each of its cores, while Exynos 9810 has a 2.9 GHz frequency only for 4 cores. The Snapdragon 845 has been benchmarked and we have seen some impressive results with significant improvements over the 835. Exynos 9810 46% Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge) Snapdragon 680 72% Exynos 9810 62% Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gaming Snapdragon 680 41% Exynos 9810 40% Antutu 8 Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed GeekBench 5.2 Site De Rencontre Jeune Serieux Gratuit. VS We compared two 8-core processors Samsung Exynos 980 with Mali-G76 MP5 graphics and Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Adreno 540. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench. ReviewDifferencesBenchmarksAnTuTu v9GeekBench 5SpecsComments Review General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators CPU Performance Single and multi-core processor tests Gaming Performance GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan Battery life Efficiency of battery consumption NanoReview Score Overall chip score Key Differences Main differences and advantages of each chip Pros of Samsung Exynos 980 Announced 2-years and 10-months laterHas a smaller size transistor 8 versus 10 nmShows better up to 23% AnTuTu 9 score – 389K vs 316KSupports 14% higher memory bandwidth against GB/sBetter instruction set architecture Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 11% higher CPU clock speed 2450 vs 2200 MHz Benchmarks Performance tests in popular benchmarks AnTuTu 9 The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios CPU 124952 82968 GPU 98562 105394 Memory 67798 49513 UX 95757 75726 Total score 389936 316666 Submit your AnTuTu result GeekBench 5 The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance Image compression - Mpixels/s Face detection - images/s Speech recognition - words/s Machine learning - images/s Camera shooting - images/s HTML 5 - Mnodes/s SQLite - Krows/s 3DMark A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan Metal 3DMark Wild Life Performance Stability - 95% Graphics test - 6 FPS Score - 1165 Specifications Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 980 and Snapdragon 835 CPU Architecture 2x GHz – Cortex-A776x GHz – Cortex-A55 4x GHz – Kryo 280 Cortex-A734x GHz – Kryo 280 Cortex-A53 Cores 8 8 Frequency 2200 MHz 2450 MHz Instruction set ARMv8-A L1 cache - 128 KB L2 cache - 2 MB Process 8 nanometers 10 nanometers Transistor count - 3 billion TDP 9 W 9 W Graphics GPU name Mali-G76 MP5 Adreno 540 Architecture Bifrost 3 Adreno 500 GPU frequency 728 MHz 739 MHz Execution units 5 2 Shading units 80 384 FLOPS 576 Gigaflops 567 Gigaflops Vulkan version OpenCL version DirectX version 12 12 Memory Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X Memory frequency 2133 MHz 1866 MHz Bus 4x 16 Bit 2x 32 Bit Max bandwidth Gbit/s Gbit/s Max size 8 GB 8 GB Multimedia ISP Neural processor NPU Yes Hexagon 682 Storage type eMMC UFS UFS Max display resolution 3360 x 1440 3840 x 2160 Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP 1x 32MP, 2x 16MP Video capture 4K at 120FPS 4K at 30FPS Video playback 4K at 120FPS 4K at 30FPS Video codecs VP9 VP9 Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV Connectivity Modem Exynos 5123 X16 4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 16 5G support Yes No Download speed Up to 3550 Mbps Up to 1000 Mbps Upload speed Up to 1380 Mbps Up to 150 Mbps Wi-Fi 6 5 Bluetooth Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS Cast your vote So, which SoC would you choose? Related Comparisons Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 835 and Exynos 980, or ask any questions VS We compared two 8-core processors Samsung Exynos 850 with Mali-G52 MP1 graphics and Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Adreno 540. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench. ReviewDifferencesBenchmarksAnTuTu v9GeekBench 5SpecsComments Review General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators CPU Performance Single and multi-core processor tests Gaming Performance GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan Battery life Efficiency of battery consumption NanoReview Score Overall chip score Key Differences Main differences and advantages of each chip Pros of Samsung Exynos 850 Announced 3-years and 7-months laterHas a smaller size transistor 8 versus 10 nmHigher GPU frequency ~11%Better instruction set architecture Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Performs better in floating-point computationsShows significantly better up to AnTuTu 9 score – 316K vs 146K23% higher CPU clock speed 2450 vs 2000 MHz Benchmarks Performance tests in popular benchmarks AnTuTu 9 The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios CPU 43099 82968 GPU 24795 105394 Memory 35711 49513 UX 41901 75726 Total score 146475 316666 Submit your AnTuTu result GeekBench 5 The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance Image compression Mpixels/s Mpixels/s Face detection images/s images/s Speech recognition words/s words/s Machine learning images/s images/s Camera shooting images/s images/s HTML 5 Mnodes/s Mnodes/s SQLite Krows/s Krows/s 3DMark A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan Metal 3DMark Wild Life Performance Stability 98% 95% Graphics test 3 FPS 6 FPS Score 508 1165 Specifications Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 850 and Snapdragon 835 CPU Architecture 8x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 4x GHz – Kryo 280 Cortex-A734x GHz – Kryo 280 Cortex-A53 Cores 8 8 Frequency 2000 MHz 2450 MHz Instruction set ARMv8-A L1 cache - 128 KB L2 cache - 2 MB Process 8 nanometers 10 nanometers Transistor count - 3 billion TDP 3 W 9 W Graphics GPU name Mali-G52 MP1 Adreno 540 Architecture Bifrost 2 Adreno 500 GPU frequency 820 MHz 739 MHz Execution units 6 2 Shading units 96 384 FLOPS 126 Gigaflops 567 Gigaflops Vulkan version OpenCL version DirectX version 12 12 Memory Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X Memory frequency 1866 MHz 1866 MHz Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 32 Bit Max bandwidth - Gbit/s Max size 8 GB 8 GB Multimedia ISP Neural processor NPU No Hexagon 682 Storage type eMMC UFS Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 3840 x 2160 Max camera resolution 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP 1x 32MP, 2x 16MP Video capture 1K at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS Video codecs VP8, VP9 VP9 Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV Connectivity Modem - X16 4G support LTE Cat. 13 LTE Cat. 16 5G support No No Download speed Up to 300 Mbps Up to 1000 Mbps Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps Up to 150 Mbps Wi-Fi 5 5 Bluetooth Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS Cast your vote So, which SoC would you choose? Snapdragon 835 31 Total votes 36 Related Comparisons Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 835 and Exynos 850, or ask any questions Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 has been announced on November 2016 whereas Samsung Exynos 9810 has been announced on January 2018. Check out detailed comparison with key specs belowBenchmark Comparison Snapdragon 835 vs Exynos 9810 Benchmark measures the performance of the CPU. Geekbench is a benchmark that measures a processor's single core performance and AnTuTu score is the most popular and trustable benchmarking score which evaluates multi core performance. Snapdragon 835 has an AnTuTu benchmark score of 283331 points with CPU, GPU, Memory, UX score 81260, 109179, 49789, 38165 Comparison Snapdragon 835 vs Exynos 9810CPU speed shows how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU. Snapdragon 835 comes up with the architecture of Adreno 500 and Exynos 9810 comes up with architecture of Bifrost. Former one has 8 core and 2450 MHz frequency and latter has 8 cores and 2900 MHz frequency. A larger cache time leads to faster Comparison Snapdragon 835 vs Exynos 9810Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 has Adreno 540 GPU with GPU Frequency as 710 MHz. Dynamic frequency allows the processor to conserve power and reduce noise when it is under a light load. Samsung Exynos 9810 has Mali-G72MP18 GPU with GPU Frequency as 572 Comparison Snapdragon 835 vs Exynos 9810First chipset has max size of 8 GB and Samsung Exynos 9810 has max size of 8 GB. It shows the maximum amount of memory supported by a and Connectivity Comparison Snapdragon 835 vs Exynos 9810In terms of multimedia, Snapdragon 835 has Hexagon 682 NPU with storage type as UFS and Exynos 9810 has Yes NPU and UFS storage type. VS We compared two 8-core processors Samsung Exynos 9820 with Mali-G76 MP12 graphics and Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Adreno 540. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench. ReviewDifferencesBenchmarksAnTuTu v9GeekBench 5SpecsComments Review General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators CPU Performance Single and multi-core processor tests Gaming Performance GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan Battery life Efficiency of battery consumption NanoReview Score Overall chip score Key Differences Main differences and advantages of each chip Pros of Samsung Exynos 9820 Announced 2-years laterShows significantly better up to 62% AnTuTu 9 score – 513K vs 316KHas a smaller size transistor 8 versus 10 nm11% higher CPU clock speed 2730 vs 2450 MHzSupports 12% higher memory bandwidth against GB/sBetter instruction set architecture Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Higher GPU frequency ~5% Benchmarks Performance tests in popular benchmarks AnTuTu 9 The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios CPU 133777 82968 GPU 178210 105394 Memory 88990 49513 UX 109918 75726 Total score 513831 316666 Submit your AnTuTu result GeekBench 5 The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance Image compression Mpixels/s Mpixels/s Face detection images/s images/s Speech recognition words/s words/s Machine learning images/s images/s Camera shooting images/s images/s HTML 5 Mnodes/s Mnodes/s SQLite Krows/s Krows/s 3DMark A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan Metal 3DMark Wild Life Performance Stability 82% 95% Graphics test 19 FPS 6 FPS Score 3228 1165 Specifications Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 9820 and Snapdragon 835 CPU Architecture 2x GHz – Mongoose M42x GHz – Cortex-A754x GHz – Cortex-A55 4x GHz – Kryo 280 Cortex-A734x GHz – Kryo 280 Cortex-A53 Cores 8 8 Frequency 2730 MHz 2450 MHz Instruction set ARMv8-A L1 cache - 128 KB L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB Process 8 nanometers 10 nanometers Transistor count billion 3 billion TDP - 9 W Graphics GPU name Mali-G76 MP12 Adreno 540 Architecture Bifrost 3 Adreno 500 GPU frequency 702 MHz 739 MHz Execution units 12 2 Shading units 192 384 FLOPS 607 Gigaflops 567 Gigaflops Vulkan version OpenCL version DirectX version 12 12 Memory Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X Memory frequency 2133 MHz 1866 MHz Bus 4x 16 Bit 2x 32 Bit Max bandwidth Gbit/s Gbit/s Max size 12 GB 8 GB Multimedia ISP Neural processor NPU Yes Hexagon 682 Storage type UFS UFS UFS Max display resolution 3840 x 2400 3840 x 2160 Max camera resolution 1x 32MP, 2x 16MP 1x 32MP, 2x 16MP Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 150FPS 4K at 30FPS Video playback 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 150FPS 4K at 30FPS Video codecs VP9 VP9 Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV Connectivity Modem Exynos 5100 X16 4G support LTE Cat. 20 LTE Cat. 16 5G support Yes No Download speed Up to 2000 Mbps Up to 1000 Mbps Upload speed Up to 316 Mbps Up to 150 Mbps Wi-Fi 6 5 Bluetooth Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS Cast your vote So, which SoC would you choose? Snapdragon 835 18 Total votes 41 Related Comparisons Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 835 and Exynos 9820, or ask any questions Home Mobile Exynos and Snapdragon have been neck and neck for years, but according to Geekbench, there's definitely a winner. Smartphones get more powerful every year, and with big hitters like the Samsung Galaxy S23 around the corner, we thought it would be pertinent to take a trip down memory lane and contextualize where these performance improvements really come from. Geekbench scores are a great way to get a high-level overview of the computational improvements from one generation to the next. They don't tell us anything else about a chipset or its power consumption, but they serve as a solid point of comparison. The data collected here comes from Geekbench 5 scores of every Samsung flagship from the Galaxy S5 onwards, and it's created from a median of 250 benchmarks run on each base device. This removes outliers and accounts for more powerful or even weaker devices that spoof legitimate Samsung phones. As expected, each generation nets performance improvements, but the results are an interesting look into the progression of smartphones over the years. About the data The data was collected for each unlocked device, and the model numbers are listed below. While Geekbench doesn't cover all aspects of a chipset, you'll find comparisons between CPU capabilities of each chip below. We display the median of the results in our graphs, and the computed median was always close to the computed mean. Device Chipset Model Samsung Galaxy S5 Snapdragon 801 SM-G900F Samsung Galaxy S5 Exynos 5422 SM-G900H Samsung Galaxy S5 Snapdragon 805 SM-G901F Samsung Galaxy S6 Exynos 7420 SM-G920F Samsung Galaxy S7 Exynos 8890 SM-G930L Samsung Galaxy S7 Snapdragon 820 SM-G930A Samsung Galaxy S8 Exynos 8895 SM-G950N Samsung Galaxy S8 Snapdragon 835 SM-G950U Samsung Galaxy S9 Exynos 9810 SM-G960F Samsung Galaxy S9 Snapdragon 845 SM-G960U1 Samsung Galaxy S10 Exynos 9820 SM-G973F Samsung Galaxy S10 Snapdragon 855 SM-G973U Samsung Galaxy S20 Exynos 990 SM-G986B Samsung Galaxy S20 Snapdragon 865 SM-G980F Samsung Galaxy S21 Exynos 2100 SM-G991N Samsung Galaxy S21 Snapdragon 888 SM-G9910 Samsung Galaxy S22 Exynos 2200 SM-S901B Samsung Galaxy S22 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM-S901E About Geekbench Geekbench is a CPU-centric test that uses several computational workloads including encryption, compression text and images, rendering, physics simulations, computer vision, ray tracing, speech recognition, and convolutional neural network inference on images. The score breakdown gives specific metrics. The final score is weighted according to the designer’s considerations, placing a large emphasis on integer performance 65%, then float performance 30%, and finally, cryptography 5%. It does not account for other improvements in the SoC or power consumption. Samsung Galaxy Exynos devices The progression of the company's Exynos processors since the Galaxy S5 has been interesting to look at. The Exynos 5422 is nowhere near what we would nowadays call a powerhouse, with a measly score of 176 in single-core and an equally weedy score of 322 in multi-core. For context, the Samsung Galaxy S22 with its Exynos 2200 SoC boasts just shy of a 10x improvement in multi-core speeds and a improvement in single-core speeds over the original Exynos 5422 that powered the Galaxy S5. That's a pretty major improvement as expected but shows how improvements are beginning to slow, as eight generations on, we don't see an 8x improvement in single-core scores. The jump from the Exynos 8895 to the 9810 was probably the biggest overall, with a large increase in single and multi-core performance. This particular score jump is likely due to the switch from Exynos M2 cores to Exynos M3 cores and an upgrade from Cortex A53 cores to Cortex A55. With an increase in cache size from 2MB to 4MB as well, we would see a decrease in cache miss rates and, in turn, a further improvement in performance as the CPU should be able to fetch more instructions from the cache instead of from the slower main memory. Further generations found a more even footing, with smaller but consistent increases of roughly 20% each time in single and multi-core performance. Samsung Galaxy Snapdragon devices Snapdragon chipsets are the cream of the crop in the Android world, and just like with the above Exynos results, these results show how far Qualcomm has come over the years. Starting off with single and multi-core scores of 156 and 445, respectively, we see massive leaps in both peaks with the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 and the Snapdragon 888. Given that the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 has its own fair share of problems, it's not too surprising to see it fall behind a little bit in the single-core department. Interestingly, in contrast to the Exynos chipsets, there aren't any major jumps from one generation to the next. Instead, it's a relatively smooth and consistent improvement year over year. You may also notice that the Samsung Galaxy S6 is missing this is likely because of the problems that the Snapdragon 810 faced. It was the first 64-bit chip from Qualcommm and would overheat quite severely. It was even blamed for why the Nexus 5X and Nexus 6P faced major bootlooping problems. Samsung instead went with Exynos for global devices that generation. However, one thing is for sure Qualcomm has always scored ahead of the same generation Exynos chipset in every Samsung device except in the case of the Exynos 2100. Samsung Galaxy Exynos and Snapdragon devices For the wider context of how Snapdragon and Exynos compare across generations, it's clear that they've always been close in performance. There is never a major digression in these chipsets' capabilities, with differences usually boiling down to power consumption or real-world performance. In normal usage, they are more or less equally comparable, and the difference in results between these chipsets can similarly be found between two results run on the same device in different conditions. In short, these results show the neck-and-neck nature of the chipset performance race and how both Qualcomm and Samsung keep up with each other. Samsung appears to lag behind a little bit, but for the most part, both do quite well and Samsung is never too far behind Qualcomm in terms of its actual performance. There are many other ways to measure a chipset, and Geekbench measures one sole aspect of a device. We're looking forward to the Samsung Galaxy S23 series, and with rumors suggesting a Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, it's possible that there may not even be an Exynos variant this year. We'll see!

snapdragon 835 vs exynos 9810